Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Is it Still Birth?  [ Revised 2/19 ] (Read 196 times)
Mysty
Ex Member
***


Perseverance is the Answer

Re: Is it Still Birth?  [ Revised 2/19 ]
Reply #19 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Dear Daniel.. I find this piece quit esoteric. I understood the whole thing though I keep wanting to change a word when I read it out loud... 

Quote:
  Is faith a solo
or is it relational
    I want to say " Is faith a solo act or is it a personal revelation "

Just my quirky train of thought though. I do find I quite like the questioning of self in this...... the almost "Self talk me into it". Thanks for sharing.

Love 

Mysty
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Ladygrace
Ex Member
***


Dance more

Re: Is it Still Birth?  [ Revised 2/19 ]
Reply #18 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Daniel,

An enlightened look at James 2:14-26!  I do stumble a little with the second line in the first stansa.  I'm not sure about your word choice "foodless".  I understand your reference to James 2:15-16 and would consider "malnourished" or possibly "hungry".   

Overall, your poem brings forth the truth that faith without deeds is indeed dead and has nothing to do with works bringing about faith.  In other words, good works are a result of faith!

Feeling your warmth in the Light,
Nancy

Just_Daniel wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am:
Minor Revision 2/19:


Is it Still Birth?

How is it faith
to greet a cold, foodless friend
Be warmed; be filled ?
Is faith detached from action
or does it demand Show me ?

Is faith a solo
or is it relational?
Abraham believed
and it changed him forever;
he was called the friend of God.

Is faith a concept
or does it conceive... action...
its deeds given birth?
As acts that trust themselves
so is do-nothing ‘faith’... dead.

© MLee Dickens'son 18 Feb 2008
reflection on James 2:14-26 

Original:
S3L3 ~ its deeds giving birth?

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Just_Daniel
Topic Starter Topic Starter
Ex Member
*****


Slow down; things will
go faster. ~ djr

Lucy...
Reply #17 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Yes, that is exactly how to learn new forms... slowly... steadily, patiently.  I'm glad that you are.

I did, however, just change one word in S3L3... 'geven' instead of 'giving'.

It occured to me that genuine faith, when it's conceived produces action... not the other way around, as 'giving' would have implied.

deLightingly appreciating your thoughtful return visit, Daniel  8)
« Last Edit: Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Lucy
Ex Member
***


Never too old to learn

Re: Is it Still Birth?
Reply #16 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Oh!  You got me again, Daniel.  I didn't think about counting syllables to see if it was a form.  So it is Tanka--ah ha!  Oh, I wouldn't change a thing, then.  I am slowly learning about different forms.  Patience, patience!  Lucy
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Just_Daniel
Topic Starter Topic Starter
Ex Member
*****


Slow down; things will
go faster. ~ djr

Alan...
Reply #15 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
alanmdouglas wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am:
Dear Daniel,

Thought-provoking, therefore excellent ! [ Thank you! ]

Davidf, no :
As acts that trust themselves
so is do-nothing ‘faith’... dead.

could be put as
Therefore like acts that trust themselves,
do-nothing ‘faith’... is dead.


Daniel, a philosopher I cleave to says:

A being is only as valuable as he can be of service to others.

So do-nothing is not an option. You, and your source, are quite right.

Love, Alan

Thank you so much for that citation and your affirmation, Alan.  It's always a deLight to have you visit.

~ Daniel  8)
« Last Edit: Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Just_Daniel
Topic Starter Topic Starter
Ex Member
*****


Slow down; things will
go faster. ~ djr

David...
Reply #14 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
davidf wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am:
Daniel,
Like Lucy, I enjoyed the read.  Just wondering ... shouldn't the last line be a question and therefore not end with a period?
~Davidf

I can see why you read it that way, since it actually can be, but no, as Alan explains, it is indeed a statement here.

deLighting in your sharing perspective, Daniel  8)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Just_Daniel
Topic Starter Topic Starter
Ex Member
*****


Slow down; things will
go faster. ~ djr

Don...
Reply #13 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Don wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am:
Dear Just-Daniel,

Oops a mental typo wrote John instead of James.  [ I knew that; I was just teasing you gaff! ]

Historically the disciples, far flung in geography, establishing the early church were clawing stone walls to survive.  Indeed their faith was indelibly strong.

[ Quite so! ]

BTW your title is okay with me.

Thank you so much for your futher comments, Don!

deLightingly, Daniel  8)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Just_Daniel
Topic Starter Topic Starter
Ex Member
*****


Slow down; things will
go faster. ~ djr

Lucy...
Reply #12 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Lucy wrote on Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am:
Hi Daniel.  I  hesitate to critique here--you are so far ahead of me in poetry--but I've noticed most of yours is done in form.

Just remember that if I'm further ahead than you, I may be going in the wrong direction and need to come back and plod the right road a little more slowly.  That's happened more than a few times, believe me!

And this, I believe is free verse.

I was hoping that it would appear to be free verse.  However, it's a collection of three tanka, which you'll easily see on further investigation.

I understand your poem easily--its what I've been taught all my life.  In all honesty, I believe you could tighten this up a bit, however. 

I'm hoping to do just that!

I've no ideas at the moment, but I want to mull this one over just a bit.  The title is a bit confusing, but probably just  me.  I'll bet you could do this in some sort of form, since form is your style.   Love your idea.   Lucy Wink

Thanks so much, Luc.  The title, actually, in this case is meant to be a bit confusing... to draw the reader into the poem... at least that was my intention.

I'll look forward to your return.

deLightingly, Daniel  8)
« Last Edit: Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
alan
Ex Member
*****



Re: Is it Still Birth?
Reply #11 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Dear Daniel,

Though-provoking, therefore excellent !

Davidf, no :

As acts that trust themselves
so is do-nothing ‘faith’... dead. 

could be put as

Therefore like acts that trust themselves,
do-nothing ‘faith’... is dead. 


Daniel, a philosopher I cleave to says :

A being is only as valuable as he can be of service to others. 

So do-nothing is not an option. You, and your source, as quite right.

Love
Alan
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
davidf
Ex Member
*****


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Re: Is it Still Birth?
Reply #10 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Daniel,
Like Lucy, I enjoyed the read.  Jus wondering...shouldn't the last line be a question and therefore not end with a period?
~Davidf
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Don
Ex Member
***


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

 Re: Is it Still Birth?
Reply #9 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Dear Just-Daniel,

Oops a mental typo wrote John instead of James. 

Historically the disciples, far flung in geography, establishing the early church were clawing stone walls to survive.  Indeed their faith was indelibly strong.

BTW your title is okay with me.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Lucy
Ex Member
***


Never too old to learn

Re: Is it Still Birth?
Reply #8 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Hi Daniel.  I  hesitate to critique here--you are so far ahead of me in poetry--but I've noticed most of yours is done in form.
And this, I believe is free verse.   I understand your poem easily--its what I've been taught all my life.  In all honesty, I believe you could tighten this up a bit, however.  I've no ideas at the moment, but I want to mull this one over just a bit.  The title is a bit confusing, but probably just  me.  I'll bet you could do this in some sort of form, since form is your style.   Love your idea.   Lucy Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Just_Daniel
Topic Starter Topic Starter
Ex Member
*****


Slow down; things will
go faster. ~ djr

Re: Is it Still Birth?
Reply #7 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
It doesn't say so here, but yes, John does agree with James.  Grin So do Peter and Paul and the rest, actually...

though some would have Paul in disagreement.

On the surface it would appear so, but it's best to see James and Paul back to back protecting each other's back side staving off enemies of the Gospel coming from two different directions:  the legalists on the one hand and the credalists on the other, to be simplistic.

Thank you for revisiting, Don.

deLightingly, Daniel  8)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Don
Ex Member
***


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Re: Is it Still Birth?
Reply #6 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Dear Just_Daniel,

Ah yes, your poem is extremely clear after reading the Biblical passage.

Faith and action are relational and faith without action is dead.  You have chosen to ask retorical questions, which contain their own answers. 

I appreciate your depth of presentation requiring a little research into a source, which you provided.  Whether or not reader agrees with John is moot.  Your poem and John do agree.

Thanks for sharing.

Don
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Don
Ex Member
***


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Re: Is it Still Birth?
Reply #5 - Jan 1st, 1970 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Hi Just_Daniel,

Thanks for your response.  I normally see your points more readily than this time.  A great deal of depth or background required to fathom the nuances.

I copied your first sentence and grammar checked it via software.  WOW! First time I've seen the reading ease at 100%.   

I apologize for not seeing the Biblical passage reference, which I will read now and return with enlightened commentary.

Don
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint